Download fahrenheit 11/9 torrent

We might as well go back to the dark ages by that logic. Agreed Scott, I can't believe how much power the Democrats just lost.

Even compared to what it was like before. Marc, thank you for offering this as a download. I was interested in seeing it. Although it is of course extremely bias, I have been screaming about some of the topics mentioned for years. On June 10, , the U. Senate unanimously passed a resolution stating, " The founders were Masons and Unitarians they did a good job but times do change Hmm, Frank, have you consulted a map recently?

Israel is IN the Middle East. It's 'involvement' is certainly guaranteed since it resides there. Blimp Guy whines: I found the most poignant part to be when the Congressional Black Caucus could not get even one Senator's signature not Wellstone; not even Lieberman!

Well, Blimpy, knowing how much they tried to cover their OWN asses on election fraud, I'm sure they were worried about more then a few missing ballots might turn up.

After all, it was the DEM party that practically invented mass voter fraud and you need look no further then Gore's campaign Chairman, William Daley , of the legendary voter fraud family.

V ominously writes: f is only the tip of the iceberg. We're all scared now. Please explain how putting millions of Jews into mass gas ovens can seem "small-time" in the next four years?

Disagreeing with Bush's policies is one thing, comparing them to Hitler and remarking it'll be 'small time' is hysteria and hyper exaggeration. Mamute writes: Greetings from Argentina. Was there a census' taken on this? Wouldn't the once great UN be a more suitable location?

R Nutt.. Yeah, liberating 50 million people was such a terrible act. For freeing the Afghan's from having to use Soccer Fields for execution grounds and emptying the rape rooms of Iraq, not to mention squeezing in the Mea Culpa of Ghadaffi and just recently Iran, not even seven days after the election, retracting it's promise to pursue nuclear material, Bush and Cheney have done a piss poor job.

Every Dutch person? And who said Bush wasn't uniting the world? Perhaps if Britain and Holland would chime in we could solve that nasty old Falkland Island problem and border disputes in the Nordic Circle. Pre-emption never seemed a problem when we were attacking Somalia or Bosnia, why now? OH, right, a republican in office. Almost forgot. And by all means, leave NATO. What's that leave us with, 6,, troops instead of 7 million?

Seriously, what amazing military advantage does Holland bring to NATO, that, if you decided to leave, most of us would even notice? Gill screams: Nice!! I know this might seem a bit exclusionary, Gill, but why not leave the actual 'election process' to the Americans. Just a thought. ScottfromBoulder chimes in: Bush's preemptive war on Iraq is just unamerican. Well, except when we bomb Bosnians and Sudanese baby food factories, then Pre-emption is completely understandable.

And when you say "Soft Intelligence", you mean to say eye-witness accounts, 12 years of documented discrepancies, admitted lapses by Iraqi officials, and Satellite Images were too 'SOFT'? What would be considered "Hard"--a signed and witnessed affidavit by Saddam? Some with their throats slashed, some jumping 45 stories to get away from the flames, other's were merely crushed as they tried to rescue their fellow brethren, and we have to gall to act pissed??

What are we thinking? Maybe Gere was right--all the terrorists need is a little love and all will be forgiven! Chris Mccausland writes: u no what i just saw NO, tell us Chris the video of when bush was in florida and the towers were getting hit and he was in a school and some won told him america is under attica and he just sat there wile hundreds of people were dying so this is what i have to say.

I know, isn't that awful!? Why didn't he just rip off his shirt, reveal his true identity as Superman, and fly as the speed of light to stop it? Why didn't the man at least run screaming from the room?? Will someone tell me, please, why couldn't he have just picked up his tricorder and call the Justice League and have them avert disaster?

I mean, seriously, they are right down the street and could have had everything right within minutes!! Seriously, a great discussion going on from the Moore fans. You have no doubt guaranteed Moore a steady income for the next years, at the very least.

Without a single hope that this will ever be published here, I leave you with my website, where you can view most of these tidbits and MOOoooore.

LOL, get it? I think the lengthy post provided by Rob unfortunately proves a trend that bothers me to no end. All too often someone ie, Rob who is upset about someone else's position in politics and government ie, just about anyone posting on this page simply spends their time belittling whoever disagrees with them, rather than providing constructive criticism and useful dialogue. One such example is the following: "Chris Mccausland writes: u no what i just saw NO, tell us Chris the video of when bush was in florida and the towers were getting hit and he was in a school and some won told him america is under attica and he just sat there wile hundreds of people were dying so this is what i have to say.

I think Chris has every right to be upset with Bush's inaction as the Twin Towers were being bombed. I was as well. No I don't believe that Bush could have called the Justice League for help and I don't think that was Chris's intention. In that specific situation, I would have appreciated it had Bush politely excused himself from the classroom, telling the kids he had a very important Presidential matter to attend to and that he'd return as soon as he could I'm sure they would be ok with that , and then convened with his advisors and members of the defense community to figure out just wtf was going on.

If the country is under attack, I do think I would like the President to cut-short his PR moment and attend to matters of state. However, Rob simply went for some cheap-shots and contributed actually nothing to this list of posts. Much like his website, which at the moment, does not seem to have any content. However I am digressing and stooping to the level of childish name-calling that I was previously complaining about.

I also don't think that the jibes at the European folks that post on this site were appropriate at all. I am from Detroit and during this past election, several incidents happened in Detroit as well as other cities around the country that simply disgusted me. I heard of folks being harrassed at the polls, that they were told that they would be arrested if they voted. They were turned away at the door and told that their voter-registration cards were invalid, when it was later proven that they were properly registered to vote.

Some people even received bogus telephone calls that day, informing them that their polling location had moved to a different address, and those individuals were given a false address and were obviously very confused. I don't know if these ridiculous acts were by Democrats or Republicans, and it really doesn't matter. How can we pretend to set-up democracy in these occupied countries when our own electoral system has become such a farce?

We have such dismal turn-out for elections. And it can be understandable that someone wouldn't vote, because under the electoral college, it's hard to believe that your vote actually counts.

Electoral votes are assigned to a state based on the number of Congressmen that state has. The reason it doesn't work is that 13 small states with a population of 18 million people have the same number of 'electors' as does California, which has 35 million voters. If you think I'm just whining because Kerry lost and I'm blaming it on the electoral college - I'm not.

Bush received That is Score: 5 , Informative. There's DVD copy from the Cannes judges. Parent Share twitter facebook. Score: 4 , Informative. CAM quality, or higher -- depends on the intent? Score: 5 , Interesting. I'll download it as soon as there's something better than a CAM out there :- While this was intended to be funny, there is some seriousness here.

I've got the CAM-POT copy from suprnova, and there is only one scene where the rip quality detracts from the experience of the film [1]. This is because the majority of the film is made up of clips of news broadcasts some captured post-transmission. Um, WTF are you talking about? Rar's ISO's is pretty standard Re:Rar's ISO's is pretty standard Score: 4 , Interesting. I know it's common but that doesn't make it right.

Actually, you're both wrong--the article is fake. Actually it seems to me the article quotes Moore and does not deny he said what he said. That said, the article DOES say that the companies involved are going to sue anybody who distributes the movie illegally. The article goes on to describe the back and forth between supporters and detractors of the film and the almost "polticial campaign" behavior of both sides.

This fight may be more significant than the actual Presidential campaign it is intended to influence. Of course, Bush is planning the Second Korean War as we speak as his "October Surprise", so all this may become irrelevant - except to prove Moore was right. Which completely sucks, because this particular POT version is missing a good 15 minutes out of the middle all the bits about the patriot act and is probably the most hideous cam I've ever seen taken of a movie.

I was downloading the DVD version hoping it was better, but now I'll stop. If you're going to advocate downloading a movie, at least have a decent telesync online first! The most interesting thing of all is how people have a hard time watching their beliefs capsize and collapse in front of their eyes. In the process to defend them they contradict themselves so badly! An example was an article in a local newspaper on how Michael Moore is just another capitalist and while people watch his documentary he is making a fortune and blah blah blah Since when capitalism became such a bad thing?

I guess I know now! Interesting, very interesting! People on the right call Moore a capitalist because they belive that everyone on the far left is a Communist and that revealing that he's making money makes him a "sell out" or something. Like he's faking being a liberal to make money. Anyone who dresses like Micheal Moore isn't too concerned about money.

There are lots of liberal capitalists. We think that making money is fine as long as you're not destroying people's lives and ruining the environment in the process. The kind that originally made this country a great place. REAL capitalism isn't about making the most sales and dominating the market. It's about providing a good or service that really has value and keeping your customer satisfied. The criminal activites that masquerade as "capitalism" these days have made a travesty of the United States.

It sickens me that so many people out there believe that they are part of something good when they support the purveyors of these activities. It also does my heart good to see that there are plenty of people who are, perhaps, starting to become a little more aware of how this country is being ruined.

Score: 4 , Insightful. MOD UP! Good businesspeople can take pride in their operations, knowing that they provide a valuable service to their communities at a reasonable price. Running a business should be an honorable profession. If it isn't, you are doing something wrong. Re:Let's call Leftism for what it is Score: 4 , Insightful. Have you ever been happy? You're a fucking idiot. Rent it? Not at Blockbuster Blockbuster boycotting Michael Moore [sisterstreet.

I've been waiting for Bowling for Columbine to come out at Blockbuster's. They had said that it would be available this month. I called yesterday and was told that they wouldn't be carrying it. When I asked if it was because of the controversy surrounding Moore, they said yes and that they were going to see.. I am pissed. Blockbuster is a huge distributor. I'm going to see if I can send an email of complaint to someone at Blockbuster's.

Re:Let's call Leftism for what it is Score: 4 , Interesting. This is very similiar to the right wing's "trust" in "free market" forces to benevolently serve the best interets of man with minimal, if any regulation. It's also very similar to the right's clinging to "trickle down" economic policies, that have zero evidence of working better than the more standard alternatives.

It's ALSO very similiar to the right's belief that you can leglislate morality without causing more harm than you solve. Keep in mind that charging for your time can have two goals : 1 Income 2 Moderation If I'm a busy person and have only a limited number of time to spend visiting special events, I'll set the price at the point where the demand for that price point will not exceed the time I have available for that activity.

This is similar to computer geeks charging people to go fix their computers once they have a real job. It's not to make more money, it's so you don't spend every single hour of your free time fixing other people's computer, and only the people that REALLY needs your help will take your time. At first I was surprised that this documentary won the first price in Cannes this year, but now I have to admit, "i'm lovin' it". Although I can't agree with some of his conclusions.

I like the way he leads us, especially Americans themselves, to remember and think about some very important issues. Going thru numerous points of why the "war-president" is wrong. For when it is, victory is not possible. The war is not meant to be won, but it is meant to be continuous. In principle the war effort is always planned to keep society on the brink of starvation. George Orwell's There, there mon ami.

We're not all Republicans. Re:Torrent Score: 5 , Informative. Better yet, where the torrent tools? My favorite is Azureus [sourceforge. Original client--no bells or whistles [bitconjurer. Re:Non, merci Score: 4 , Insightful. They claim that the virus is indeed harmless. Most of them think AIDS is also not sexually transmitted; it probably has toxic causes.

People die because they are poisoned to death by toxic antiviral drugs. If Moore's film were actually full of shit, like you say, then people would just ignore it like hundreds of other documentaries.

Since it has millions of Republican's panties in a bunch, it must be doing something right. People only get this defensive when they know deep down inside that they're wrong. Extreme left? You lefties have a strange definition of patriotism. Patriotism: Love of and devotion to one's country.

Now, where does Moore say he doesn't like his country? I can only see him objecting to his country's government. Maybe he go as far as to make documentaries about it because he cares so much for his country and that it's properly run? That's what this is all about. You should go watch the movie, or at least the part where it showed Bush sitting around looking like a monkey for 7 minutes.

He is not actually reading the book with the children, he is glancing at it and looking around nervously for 7 minutes trying to decide what to do. Re:Stop pinning this on Bush. You didn't even mention the security aspect of his sitting there for 7 minutes.

The point is, it was stupid to sit there for 7 minutes after the second plane hit, ANY way you look at it. But then, I guess any level of discussion of our government in negative terms is only ok if it involves a democratic president getting a blowjob, right?

Certainly we have no room to be negative when we're at war, even if we can't generate one solid reason as to why we are at war and what good we are actually doing in a country that never threatened us directly, while giving up on and letting run free a terrorist that has attacked us several times including the largest foreign attack on our soil ever, who happens to be related to the business partners of our president.

Obviously our priorities are out of whack for questioning that. What ARE we thinking? Your definition of patriotism is actually nationalism, there is a very big difference. Nationalism is the beleif that your nation is right above all others, patriotism is the love for your country expressed. Moore expresses the love for his country in a very meaninfull way.

He created a documentary which describes what he thinks is wrong with the government in an effort to change that. You can find very few people, you included, who have gone to the efforts that Micheal Moore has to bring what he beleives is injustice to light. In fact, that by definition makes Micheal Moore one of the most patriotic people in America. What you beleive is Nationalism, which is patriotism expressed as "My nation is right.

Many people tend to forget that the most patriotic men, the founders of our country, railed heartily against our government for many of the same reasons. The only difference between their actions and the actions of Micheal Moore, is that M. Moore exists in a system where the Govt.

The great thing about America is that we do not need revolutions for this kind of thing. So, saying that Micheal Moore is a patriot, and that he loves America is a patently true statement, by any logical definition. But the definitions of each would put error to your belief. Annendum: I use the main definition of patriotism which is the expression of love for ones country. And a common second definition of Nationalism which is the beleif that your country is right above all others.

Take it up with Teddy Score: 5 , Insightful. It does not mean to stand by the President. He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and disinterested service to the nation as a whole. Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly as necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right.

Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.

Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else. Re:Not a documentary Score: 5 , Insightful. The reverse is also true. Saying it is not a documentary does not make it so. If you have evidence that something in the film is untrue, then please be specific. People hear the word "documentary" and they can only think of National Geographic and the Discovery Channel.

Every big newspaper has a page of opinion columns. The goal of that page is to present well thought out arguments from different viewpoints.

It's still a documentary. Spork writes: on Sunday July 04, AM Saying it's not a documentary does not make its content false. Not if you say it a thousand times or more. Re:Not a documentary Score: 5 , Interesting. Documentaries certainly have points of view, and they always have. Argument by assertion. If you deny that, you don't know what a documentary is, Ad hominem. So if I say I disagree with you, it's an ad hominem attack because it implies you are stupid, uneducated, or believe false information?

You seem to mistakenly believe and attempt to prove by a baseless assertion, since we're so fond of meta-talk here that an ad hominem attack is any argument which implicitly insults an opponent, when in fact it is merely an argument which attempts to prove its correctness solely through insulting the opponent.

In other words, if I tell you you are wrong about the definition of ad hominem, but back it up with, say, a definition [reference. This is ad numeram or perhaps even ad verecundiam, depending on who is doing the "accepting".

Once again, we've somehow managed to retain our knowledge of Latin terms, but not their proper usage. But in this instance, you are arguing over the meaning of a word--whether this film can rightfully be called a documentary--and so to make his case, it is perfectly legitimate to present what the majority opinion is on the meaning of that word assuming we both accept that language is determined by the practitioners and not by the dictionary publishers; feel free to dispute with the parent as desired.

Isn't debating fun? Not that it really matters. Those that exist after the nomination are voluntary though candidates are monetarily encouraged to accept them. Therefore, even if ended with "I'm John Kerry and I approved this message" it's still perfectly justifiable as far as political speech goes.

We're socialized to believe otherwise because our first exposure to documentaries is generally in elementary school with a discussion of how babies are made, the discovery of America by Christopher Columbus, or the formation of stars or some such.

Of course, all these documentaries have an opinion as well. Many would argue that the babies films indicate a difference between a fetus and a baby. It's worth noting that Columbus wasn't even the first European to set foot in the Americas and that many prefer Genesis to the gravitational condensation of gas as the reason stars form.

Wow, worst run on sentence ever 3 - Integrity? Moore said he was producing a film that accused Bush of all kinds of insidious things. He produced the film. Gotta at least take the man at his word. Bush, on the other hand, pledged to reduce the size of the federal government and refrain from engaging in "Nation building.

I'm not saying Moore's film isn't misleading. I'm not saying it's not propaganda. There is an art to arranging facts in a certain way so as to prove a point. There is a finesse in accomplishing that task in such a way as to leave your audience with an opinion that you never actually stated. Moore is a master of this technique.

Nothing, and I say that after an appreciable amount of investigation, in Moore's film is untrue. Nonetheless, he has artfully arranged things to imply more than he says.

Those implications are opinion, not fact. A wary observer will note the difference. As for journalistic That's journalism too. Without France, the US might never have existed. France had major interests in Iraq. There are pictures of Jacques Chirac with Saddam from the s. Of course, there are more recent pictures of Donald Rumsfeld with Saddam [about. The Mujahideen NB: there are a variety of english spellings for the arabic word, as with most arabic words.

See the wikipedia entry for Mujahideen [wikipedia. It's a general word. In the afghani case, the taliban were but one faction of the collective resistance movement known as the mujahideen. After the war with the Russians, there was civil war between the Taliban and the other factions, the taliban gaining control of most, but not all, of Afghanistan.

As for motives. Let's be honest, every major power which takes an interest in the middle-east does so because of oil. Additionally, the US has a strong political affiliation with Israel, and has long been very involved in assuring Israeli security.

The current administration in particular is quite interested in Israel. So taking out Iraq is something the the people behind the Bush administration have had as a goal since long before Total bought Petrofina at some point and then TotalFina merged with Elf in The complaints are usually aimed at the cowardice and weakness of the French republic which didn't emerge for at least a decade after that ? That is a pretty ignorant statement as you are ignoring a lot of French history after The biggest ommision is Napoleon.

Did you not know that Napoleon Controlled most of Europe? He was also slugging it out with our main Enemy in the early 19th century, the English. Remember when the British invaded the U. S in and burned D. France was anything but weak under Napoleon. You also seem to be ignoring the hardships that the French endured over the 19th and 20th century. The aftermath of the Napoleonic wars left France with an installed Monarch and a subsequent revolution in It's hard to fight Wars when there are missing generations of Men.

I think your view of France has been shaped by the English. The English hate the French. They have a very big rivalry as they were at war with each other for hundreds of years. Much of our society and law have been influenced by the English. When you think of the middle ages and knights do you not think of King arthur and an English settings. The fact is the French and other European countries were more advanced at an earlier stage than the English. Just travel to England and France and compare the architecture and the time periods in which they were built.

You will see that the French were more advanced in their architecture and building methods than the English. For more info on why the Brittish hate the French and vise versa Re:Ahistorical and ungratefull Score: 4 , Insightful. It might be reasonable to claim that the French planned a stupid defense in WWII, but it's hard to claim that they weren't brave A nation is composed of a multitude of people. They aren't all the same. The result has been a torrent of criticism from Moore supporters and his distribution company, Lions Gate Entertainment.

The site was even the target of a denial-of-service attack a few days ago. The online flap may say more about the often-conflicting desires of creators and their business agents than it does about the political debate over Moore's film.

While studios and record labels have uniformly excoriated unauthorized sharing of movies and music online, many artists--particularly those eager for the propagation of their political messages--have sent more mixed messages. Moore's own comments came in an interview, clips of which have been floating around the Net at least since January.

Kenefick said he was not able to verify the original source. While the technology is used by software companies including Linux distributors as a way to circulate their products, it is also widely used to distribute first-run movies and TV shows.

Like many early pirated releases, the copy was shot by a handheld camcorder, with poor-quality audio and shaking visuals, Kenefick said. The founders of the site, which launched in late after the release of 'Bowling for Columbine,' said they have not heard directly from Moore or Lions Gate about their link to the BitTorrent file.

Several lawyers have contacted them with offers of support, if there is a legal question, Kenefick said. Fahrenheit 11 9 full movie, online, free Fahrenheit 11 9 Full Movie Fahrenheit 11 9 Torrent Magnet Download Fahrenheit 11 9 Torrent The controversial film--like virtually every new release--has been circulating online for days.

A representative of Lions Gate did not immediately return calls for comment. It's big. Its megs. So - if you are on a slow connection - don't even bother. Go rent the DVD. But if you have DSL or better - here it is. Somewhat related, I just saw this on FactCheck. Not true. In fact, the FBI questioned 22 of them and found no links to terrorism.

Is the list of XXX passwords coming up next?